_com1_ NBINF-O5-12R5N (54)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive134% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
System_com1_ NBINF-O5-12R5N (54)  (all builds)
MotherboardStandard GM5AGE00054COM
Memory1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220609
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 13 '24 at 08:21
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 0.4 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Memory 13.9
1-Core 102
2-Core 31.3
31% 49.1 Pts
4-Core 62.8
8-Core 106
10% 84.3 Pts
64-Core 196
12% 196 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1D05 1178) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.5% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 2
Parallax 2.2
2% 2 fps
MRender 1.8
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 1.6
2% 1.93 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 1.5%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata LEGEND 800 500GB
290GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0309A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1097 1071 1133 1094 1182 1126 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 1,041
Write 1,276
Mixed 1,020
SusWrite 1,117
252% 1,113 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 22.7
4K Mixed 19.7
64% 20.1 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 75.3
DQ Mixed 84.3
66% 91.5 MB/s
Poor: 117%
This bench: 134%
Great: 361%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
34% Below average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 14.4
40% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 4.7
12% 4.27 GB/s
Latency 362
11% 362 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 34%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 2 11 2 144 15.5" 1920 1057 BOE090F
Typical NBINF-O5-12R5N (54) Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: _com1_ NBINF-O5-12R5N (54)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback