Casper EXCALIBUR G870

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.59% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCasper EXCALIBUR G870  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER NLXB 001
Memory22.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230417
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 13 '24 at 07:10
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12450H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Memory 55.9
1-Core 167
2-Core 326
93% 183 Pts
4-Core 569
8-Core 905
91% 737 Pts
64-Core 1,108
69% 1,108 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Quanta(152D 1513) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3688
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
7.59% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 14.8
Parallax 9.4
6% 10.4 fps
MRender 12.5
Gravity 14.8
Splatting 13.8
11% 13.7 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.59%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kioxia-exceria G2 SSD 1TB
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFA17.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 655 319 326 345 351 328 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 395
Write 1,075
Mixed 232
SusWrite 387
119% 522 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 67.6
4K Mixed 37.1
121% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 870
DQ Write 1,048
DQ Mixed 448
480% 789 MB/s
Poor: 132%
This bench: 120%
Great: 251%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT32G4SFD832A.C16FF 1x31GB
1 of 2 slots used
31GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
45.3% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 16
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 12.8
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 50 17 144 27" 1920 1080 HKM2700 E27FHD-G
Typical EXCALIBUR G870 Builds (Compare 360 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

System: Casper EXCALIBUR G870

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback