Lenovo 20QSS0J100

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive132% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 20QSS0J100  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20QSS0J100
Memory57.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 13 '24 at 05:16
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9850H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 84.5
1-Core 117
2-Core 232
81% 144 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 620
67% 530 Pts
64-Core 722
45% 722 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 229B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1122
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
4.71% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 8.5
5% 8.07 fps
MRender 9.7
Gravity 7
Splatting 0.3
4% 5.67 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.71%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Thnsf5512gpuk TOSHIBA 512GB
406GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51055KLA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 536 459 381 368 390 395 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 722
Write 790
Mixed 730
SusWrite 422
150% 666 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 71.8
4K Mixed 46.5
150% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 816
DQ Write 552
DQ Mixed 660
499% 676 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 132%
Great: 163%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GS6JJR8N-VK Kingston 9905744-027.A00G HMA82GS6JJR8N-VK Kingston 9905744-027.A00G 64GB
2667, 3200, 2667, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
78.1% Very good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 24.5
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 34
SC Mixed 25.6
72% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 17.2" 1280 720 LEN4121
Typical 20QSS0J100 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20QSS0J100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback