Asrock A320M-HDV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181004
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateMay 13 '24 at 04:09
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 200GE-$52
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
41.5% Average
Memory 48.4
1-Core 71.7
2-Core 117
46% 79.1 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 200
27% 200 Pts
64-Core 181
11% 181 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 3 (Ryzen iGPU)
AMD(1002 15DD) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
4.16% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 6.9
Parallax 6.4
3% 5.8 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 9.5
6% 6.67 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.16%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
312GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SC23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 118 91 132 135 138 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 143
Write 150
Mixed 70
SusWrite 116
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GD2.0927WH.001 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
21.4% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 7
21% 7.33 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 6.2
18% 6.43 GB/s
Latency 163
24% 163 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 4 85 58 60 18.5" 1280 720 GSM5ACB LG HD
Typical A320M-HDV Builds (Compare 839 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback