Gigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics86.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive339% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS ULTRA
MotherboardGigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1862 x 1036 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211105
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 13 '24 at 02:53
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700KF-$250
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Memory 91.3
1-Core 146
2-Core 286
96% 174 Pts
4-Core 566
8-Core 1,086
98% 826 Pts
64-Core 1,093
68% 1,093 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2042 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Lighting 109
Reflection 117
Parallax 106
89% 111 fps
MRender 97.8
Gravity 102
Splatting 104
83% 101 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 PRO with Heatsink 1TB
751GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1366 1986 1858 2059 2256 2292 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
339% Outstanding
Read 1,840
Write 1,675
Mixed 1,602
SusWrite 1,969
400% 1,772 MB/s
4K Read 63.6
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 87.2
278% 93.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,474
DQ Write 1,152
DQ Mixed 1,283
968% 1,303 MB/s
Poor: 236%
This bench: 339%
Great: 477%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
830GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 96 94 95 92 96 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 99.9
Write 99.7
Mixed 50.4
SusWrite 92.6
63% 85.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
105% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF2G64AZ-3G2E1 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 38.6
MC Write 41.8
MC Mixed 32.4
107% 37.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 44.7
SC Mixed 28.8
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 104%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 1: 0P 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 2% 62 217 58 60 72.3" 1280 720 MTCEE01 TV
Typical GA-Z390 AORUS ULTRA-CF Builds (Compare 7,795 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra - $172

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $1,245
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback