Dell Inspiron 15-3552

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Inspiron 15-3552  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 079W3P
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180306
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 13 '24 at 01:52
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User SAU-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N3060
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Memory 24.5
1-Core 16.6
2-Core 26.1
15% 22.4 Pts
4-Core 26.2
8-Core 26.7
4% 26.5 Pts
64-Core 22.4
1% 22.4 Pts
Poor: 6%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 28%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Dell(1028 06AC) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.84% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 2
2% 2.23 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 2
2% 1.73 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.84%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
222GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AM0A1D
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 81.5
Write 88.4
Mixed 30
49% 66.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 60%
VendorC ProductCode 64GB
59GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 30 24 28 28 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 53.4
Write 28.8
Mixed 18.4
SusWrite 27.5
39% 32 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.5
50% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RZX-D3D11M1600BL-8 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
8.42% Terrible
MC Read 2.5
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 2.7
8% 2.9 GB/s
SC Read 1.8
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 2
6% 2.17 GB/s
Latency 349
12% 349 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 8.42%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 37 27 60 15.5" 1366 745 CMN15DC
Typical Inspiron 15-3552 Builds (Compare 449 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Inspiron 15-3552

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback