Asus ROG STRIX B650E-E GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive369% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B650E-E GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory19.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240412
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 13 '24 at 00:37
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$310
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
98% Outstanding
Memory 80.1
1-Core 184
2-Core 354
109% 206 Pts
4-Core 620
8-Core 1,089
103% 854 Pts
64-Core 1,625
101% 1,625 Pts
Poor: 105%
This bench: 98%
Great: 122%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Ryzen 7000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 8877) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.4.1
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
7.92% Terrible
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 13.4
Parallax 13.6
6% 11.4 fps
MRender 13
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 20.8
12% 13.7 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.92%
Great: 9%
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$459
Nvidia(10DE 14B2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
128% Outstanding
Lighting 177
Reflection 198
Parallax 192
144% 189 fps
MRender 204
Gravity 137
Splatting 113
119% 151 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 128%
Great: 170%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$160
451GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2398 1762 1756 1759 1669 1747 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
369% Outstanding
Read 2,664
Write 2,934
Mixed 2,636
SusWrite 1,848
568% 2,521 MB/s
4K Read 62.2
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 84.2
269% 91 MB/s
DQ Read 1634
DQ Write 1,296
DQ Mixed 1,491
1,109% 1,474 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 369%
Great: 526%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX5M2B6400C36 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
186% Outstanding
MC Read 73.3
MC Write 63.2
MC Mixed 72
199% 69.5 GB/s
SC Read 45.2
SC Write 60.1
SC Mixed 54.7
152% 53.3 GB/s
Latency 78.7
51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 133%
This bench: 186%
Great: 207%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 7: 0P 0R 1G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
7% 38% 13 149 8 180 31.5" 2560 1369 GSM5BD3 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical ROG STRIX B650E-E GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 88 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 418%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B650E-E GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $2,239
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback