Gigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE AX DDR4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 344%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 411%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 116%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics308% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive384% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE AX DDR4  (all builds)
Memory24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211008
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 13 '24 at 00:37
Run Duration290 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900KF-$290
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Memory 81.3
1-Core 204
2-Core 409
120% 231 Pts
4-Core 807
8-Core 1,577
141% 1,192 Pts
64-Core 2,851
176% 2,851 Pts
Poor: 110%
This bench: 116%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$970
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
308% Outstanding
Lighting 468
Reflection 438
Parallax 471
382% 459 fps
MRender 569
Gravity 377
Splatting 271
316% 406 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 308%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
232GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731030WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1694 532 409 400 403 411 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
384% Outstanding
Read 4,035
Write 3,804
Mixed 2905
SusWrite 642
635% 2,846 MB/s
4K Read 72.5
4K Write 219
4K Mixed 92.7
345% 128 MB/s
DQ Read 1,992
DQ Write 1,537
DQ Mixed 1,621
1,252% 1,717 MB/s
Poor: 249%
This bench: 384%
Great: 623%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
87GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 188 82 81 82 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 476
Mixed 411
SusWrite 166
87% 390 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 84.3
4K Mixed 42.2
148% 53 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 339
255% 341 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 121%
Sabrent Rocket Q 1TB
494GB free
Firmware: RKT30Q.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1694 1690 1694 1701 1707 991 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
291% Outstanding
Read 1,268
Write 1,706
Mixed 1,262
SusWrite 1,580
329% 1,454 MB/s
4K Read 51.7
4K Write 237
4K Mixed 83.9
312% 124 MB/s
DQ Read 737
DQ Write 1,407
DQ Mixed 932
748% 1,025 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 291%
Great: 305%
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
746GB free
Firmware: 731030WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3893 4030 4010 3942 3891 3971 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
580% Outstanding
Read 3,658
Write 4,099
Mixed 3,000
SusWrite 3,956
831% 3,678 MB/s
4K Read 72
4K Write 218
4K Mixed 99.1
352% 130 MB/s
DQ Read 2083
DQ Write 1,680
DQ Mixed 1,834
1,386% 1,866 MB/s
Poor: 249%
This bench: 580%
Great: 623%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 37.2
MC Write 36.8
MC Mixed 35.6
104% 36.5 GB/s
SC Read 24.9
SC Write 41.4
SC Mixed 31.1
93% 32.5 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 102%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 42 7 144 31.5" 2560 1369 GSM7729 LG QHD
Typical GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE AX DDR4 Builds (Compare 4,974 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 209%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 230%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE AX DDR4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $1,015
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback