Asrock B650M-HDV/M.2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics84.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsrock B650M-HDV/M.2  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock B650M-HDV/M.2
Memory21.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240327
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateMay 13 '24 at 00:34
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 79.2
1-Core 188
2-Core 373
111% 213 Pts
4-Core 682
8-Core 1,078
108% 880 Pts
64-Core 1,290
80% 1,290 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 103%
Great: 114%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600M
AMD(1002 0E36) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.4.1
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
84.2% Excellent
Lighting 84.2
Reflection 123
Parallax 157
69% 122 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 85.6
Splatting 148
115% 140 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 88%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN850X NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 620361WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,459
Write 4,616
Mixed 3,306
920% 4,127 MB/s
4K Read 58.8
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 75.2
266% 95.5 MB/s
DQ Read 2,125
DQ Write 1,607
DQ Mixed 1,802
1,365% 1,845 MB/s
Poor: 283% Great: 685%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown UD5-6000 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
150% Outstanding
MC Read 50
MC Write 58
MC Mixed 54
154% 54 GB/s
SC Read 44.6
SC Write 59.2
SC Mixed 49.9
146% 51.2 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 140%
This bench: 150%
Great: 204%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 165 27" 1280 720 MSI6CC3 MSI G271CQR
Typical B650M-HDV/M.2 Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 196%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 200%
UFO

System: Asrock B650M-HDV/M.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $1,065
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback