Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LU_FX506LU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.24% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LU_FX506LU  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX506LU
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211126
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 23:56
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User MNE-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
76.4% Very good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 116
2-Core 210
80% 139 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 497
52% 417 Pts
64-Core 507
31% 507 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 18DF) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7985
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
5.24% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 5.7
Parallax 6.9
5% 6.13 fps
MRender 6.5
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 9.7
6% 7.33 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.24%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$54
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,271
Write 1,151
Mixed 1,139
265% 1,187 MB/s
4K Read 47.3
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 65.3
217% 76.3 MB/s
DQ Read 908
DQ Write 769
DQ Mixed 807
613% 828 MB/s
Poor: 122% Great: 239%
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GB
81GB free
Firmware: P6MA001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 790 985 356 65 66 34 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
191% Outstanding
Read 1,556
Write 1,048
Mixed 970
SusWrite 383
220% 989 MB/s
4K Read 56.9
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 70.3
242% 83.7 MB/s
DQ Read 611
DQ Write 754
DQ Mixed 263
315% 543 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 191%
Great: 247%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.9% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 9
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 11.3
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 48 144 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1521
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LU_FX506LU Builds (Compare 987 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LU_FX506LU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback