TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Z4 G4 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive233% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Z4 G4 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81C5
Memory56.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230322
Uptime9.9 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 23:41
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-2125
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
81% Excellent
Memory 76.7
1-Core 116
2-Core 208
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 458
8-Core 714
72% 586 Pts
64-Core 711
44% 711 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑
This bench: 81%
 Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
EVGA(3842 3657)
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 122
Parallax 128
110% 129 fps
MRender 146
Gravity 105
Splatting 91.2
91% 114 fps
Poor: 90% ↑
This bench: 103%
 Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
314GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXA74H0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1409 1368 1334 1320 1316 1300 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
233% Outstanding
Read 1,511
Write 1,337
Mixed 527
SusWrite 1341
264% 1,179 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 47.7
172% 65.7 MB/s
DQ Read 974
DQ Write 723
DQ Mixed 824
622% 840 MB/s
Poor: 149% ↑
This bench: 233%
 Great: 306%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 912GB
849GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 789 786 801 724 705 711 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 1,077
Write 674
Mixed 387
SusWrite 753
161% 723 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 61.4
4K Mixed 22
91% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 400
DQ Mixed 249
227% 346 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑
This bench: 134%
 Great: 146%
Seagate ST3000NM0033-9ZM178 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: EN09
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 167 170 169 167 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 163
Mixed 89.6
SusWrite 168
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
217% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑
This bench: 96.1%
 Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965589-029.D01G Samsung M393A2G40EB1-CPB Samsung M393A2G40EB1-CPB Samsung M393A2G40EB1-CPB 64GB
2400, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
79.2% Very good
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 46
MC Mixed 24.7
89% 31 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 20.6
SC Mixed 9.4
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 89.8
44% 89.8 ns
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 38 4 60 23" 1280 720 HWP300E HP LV2311
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Z4 G4 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,085 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: HP Z4 G4 Workstation

CPU
Xeon W-2123IntelBench 70%, 2,702 samples638x
Xeon W-2133IntelBench 77%, 1,612 samples308x
Xeon W-2125IntelBench 78%, 1,514 samples300x
GPU
Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 41%, 13,958 samples371x
Quadro P4000NvidiaBench 67%, 12,628 samples351x
Quadro RTX 4000NvidiaBench 98%, 9,173 samples332x
SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H2 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 2,013 samples275x
MZVLB1T0HBLR-000H1 1TBSamsungBench 264%, 8,018 samples219x
MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 17,828 samples199x
RAM
M393A1K43BB1-CTD 4x8GBSamsungBench 81%, 410 samples90x
M393A1K43BB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 370 samples90x
M393A2K40CB2-CVF 2x16GBSamsungBench 57%, 150 samples65x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback