Inet_ab MS-7E26

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 116%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics219% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemInet_ab MS-7E26  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star B650 GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E26)
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240206
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 23:04
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$310
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Memory 97.4
1-Core 195
2-Core 387
120% 226 Pts
4-Core 720
8-Core 1,291
121% 1,005 Pts
64-Core 1,789
111% 1,789 Pts
Poor: 105%
This bench: 116%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-S (Super)-$590
Asus(1043 8970) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 6050 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
219% Outstanding
Lighting 323
Reflection 277
Parallax 298
263% 299 fps
MRender 393
Gravity 248
Splatting 197
218% 279 fps
Poor: 173%
This bench: 219%
Great: 235%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN850X NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$85
635GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 620331WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,872
Write 3,927
Mixed 2,968
800% 3,589 MB/s
4K Read 55.6
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 66.9
238% 83.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,987
DQ Write 1,545
DQ Mixed 1,835
1,354% 1,789 MB/s
Poor: 251% Great: 598%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F5-6000J3038F16G 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
197% Outstanding
MC Read 78.7
MC Write 66.1
MC Mixed 70.2
205% 71.7 GB/s
SC Read 62.5
SC Write 61.3
SC Mixed 59.8
175% 61.2 GB/s
Latency 48.5
82% 48.5 ns
Poor: 146%
This bench: 197%
Great: 238%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 165 27" 1280 720 ACR09CD VG271 S
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback