Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1402ZA_F1402ZA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive159% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1402ZA_F1402ZA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X1402ZA
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221026
Uptime104 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 22:28
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1255U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Memory 65.9
1-Core 150
2-Core 300
90% 172 Pts
4-Core 469
8-Core 734
74% 602 Pts
64-Core 946
58% 946 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Asus(1043 1E72) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4032
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Lighting 20.6
Reflection 24.2
Parallax 24.3
17% 23 fps
MRender 20.7
Gravity 29.9
Splatting 19.4
19% 23.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_2400_MTFDKBA512QFM 512GB
383GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3MA003 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1067 1176 1002 215 78 283 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
159% Outstanding
Read 1,267
Write 1,316
Mixed 1,049
SusWrite 637
240% 1,067 MB/s
4K Read 50.9
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 33.4
177% 64 MB/s
DQ Read 539
DQ Write 261
DQ Mixed 420
306% 407 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 159%
Great: 234%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
71.6% Very good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 24.7
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 32.4
SC Mixed 21.1
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 13.9" 1280 720 CMN14E5
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1402ZA_F1402ZA Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1402ZA_F1402ZA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback