Lenovo 82WQ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 115%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics3.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive392% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82WQ  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory19.2 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240115
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 21:40
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Memory 73.7
1-Core 196
2-Core 426
117% 232 Pts
4-Core 833
8-Core 1503
140% 1,168 Pts
64-Core 2,910
180% 2,910 Pts
Poor: 108%
This bench: 115%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 3B64) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.95% Terrible
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 11
Parallax 8.3
6% 8.87 fps
MRender 0.1
Gravity 0.1
Splatting 0.1
0% 0.1 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 3.95%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron MTFDKBA1T0TFH 1TB
717GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1006P7LN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2775 3103 3834 1308 1270 1260 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
392% Outstanding
Read 2,859
Write 2,714
Mixed 2,039
SusWrite 2,258
555% 2,468 MB/s
4K Read 45.4
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 72.5
246% 92.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,632
DQ Write 1,210
DQ Mixed 1,386
1,046% 1,409 MB/s
Poor: 204%
This bench: 392%
Great: 528%
Micron MTFDKBA1T0TFH 1TB
949GB free
Firmware: 1006P7LN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2460 2698 2704 2053 1262 1284 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
342% Outstanding
Read 2302
Write 1,690
Mixed 2,067
SusWrite 2,077
458% 2,034 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 89
4K Mixed 57
176% 61.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,741
DQ Write 1,331
DQ Mixed 1520
1,141% 1,531 MB/s
Poor: 204%
This bench: 342%
Great: 528%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R2GA3BB0-CWMOD 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
136% Outstanding
MC Read 59.4
MC Write 47.3
MC Mixed 52.3
151% 53 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 38.4
SC Mixed 25.4
78% 27.3 GB/s
Latency 86.8
46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 107%
This bench: 136%
Great: 179%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 240 16" 2048 1209 CSO1628
Typical 82WQ Builds (Compare 1,426 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 212%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 256%
UFO

System: Lenovo 82WQ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback