Asrock CML-HDV/M.2 TPM R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 123%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive201% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsrock CML-HDV/M.2 TPM R2.0  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock CML-HDV/M.2 TPM R2.0
Memory23.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230503
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 21:33
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User LUX-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700F-$180
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Memory 92.5
1-Core 143
2-Core 282
95% 172 Pts
4-Core 564
8-Core 983
94% 774 Pts
64-Core 1,409
87% 1,409 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6750-XT
Asus(1043 05E7) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 24.4.1
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 144
Reflection 138
Parallax 298
118% 193 fps
MRender 252
Gravity 150
Splatting 198
163% 200 fps
Poor: 124%
This bench: 127%
Great: 132%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 1TB
462GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC2S038E Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1365 1379 1326 98 108 114 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
201% Outstanding
Read 1,769
Write 1,490
Mixed 1,239
SusWrite 732
292% 1,307 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 71.8
4K Mixed 51.9
168% 55.1 MB/s
DQ Read 776
DQ Write 703
DQ Mixed 780
574% 753 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 201%
Great: 320%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
79.8% Very good
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 22
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 32.8
SC Mixed 22.3
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 144 27" 2560 1368 AOC2701 27G1G4
Typical CML-HDV/M.2 TPM R2.0 Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

System: Asrock CML-HDV/M.2 TPM R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $446
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback