Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7300HQ 170,871 User benchmarks, average bench 57% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	69.7% Good	Memory 80.7 1-Core 86.4 2-Core 175 66% 114 Pts	4-Core 353 8-Core 272 44% 313 Pts	64-Core 272 17% 272 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 69%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB 11,069 User benchmarks, average bench 176% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4L1QCXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1791 Write 635 Mixed 560 216% 995 MB/s	4K Read 45 4K Write 80.7 4K Mixed 54 180% 59.9 MB/s	DQ Read 830 DQ Write 560 DQ Mixed 602 474% 664 MB/s
Poor: 108% Great: 234%
FCCT480M500SSD1 480GB 632 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 200GB free Firmware: MU05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 310 313 308 302 311 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	69.7% Good	Read 344 Write 309 Mixed 291 SusWrite 310 71% 314 MB/s	4K Read 8.6 4K Write 62.1 4K Mixed 21.1 73% 30.6 MB/s	DQ Read 340 DQ Write 308 DQ Mixed 174 172% 274 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown J641GU42J9266ND 859B CT8G4SFS824A.M8FD 16GB 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	69.2% Good	MC Read 25.8 MC Write 27.2 MC Mixed 21.5 71% 24.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 24.1 SC Mixed 19.8 56% 19.5 GB/s	Latency 75.1 53% 75.1 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	1	197	56	60	0"	1536 801

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 33%

Sail boat

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	892x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	577x

GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 43%, 36,643 samples	781x
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	685x
GeForce GTX 1070NvidiaBench 42%, 1 sample	1x

SSD
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	305x
MZVLW128HEGR-000L2 128GBSamsungBench 171%, 6,569 samples	96x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GBSamsungBench 176%, 11,069 samples	77x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	165x
RMSA3260MH78HAF-2666 2x8GBRamaxelBench 71%, 6,014 samples	160x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	135x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16