HP OMEN by HP Laptop

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8257
Memory4.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161228
Uptime31.2 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 20:44
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 74.6
1-Core 82
2-Core 162
62% 106 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 311
41% 308 Pts
64-Core 312
19% 312 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960M
HP(103C 8257) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.5222
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 22.2
Reflection 25.5
Parallax 20.4
18% 22.7 fps
MRender 24.3
Gravity 22.9
Splatting 16.7
17% 21.3 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9TN8W512G1122 512GB
207GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6107100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 364 378 394 390 385 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Read 406
Write 344
Mixed 199
SusWrite 376
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 63
4K Mixed 35.7
123% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 260
207% 290 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 113%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
132GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3T0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 71 69 69 70 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 65.7
Write 65.2
Mixed 13.7
SusWrite 69.2
39% 53.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
107% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 1315 CT8G4SFD8213.C16FDD2 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.4% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15.4
48% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 14.6
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 86.5
46% 86.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 55 60 15.5" 1536 801 LGD0532
Typical OMEN by HP Laptop Builds (Compare 6,148 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback