Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive233% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191119
Uptime10.2 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 20:38
Run Duration277 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Memory 71.3
1-Core 143
2-Core 284
88% 166 Pts
4-Core 546
8-Core 977
92% 761 Pts
64-Core 1,441
89% 1,441 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Asus(1043 8728) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.65
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
117% Outstanding
Lighting 152
Reflection 154
Parallax 153
124% 153 fps
MRender 184
Gravity 136
Splatting 119
116% 146 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 117%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pcie SSD 1TB
265GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 966 1299 886 766 493 454 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
233% Outstanding
Read 1,424
Write 2,420
Mixed 1,595
SusWrite 811
354% 1,562 MB/s
4K Read 45.9
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 75.7
250% 93.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,238
DQ Write 961
DQ Mixed 1,067
807% 1089 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 233%
Great: 284%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
176GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 380 379 379 379 380 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 448
Mixed 430
SusWrite 386
99% 442 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 91.2
4K Mixed 58
190% 64.6 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 198
149% 200 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 112%
Great: 129%
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$169
1.5TB free
Firmware: 3B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4375 4374 4371 4380 4335 2385 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
520% Outstanding
Read 3,015
Write 4,513
Mixed 3,309
SusWrite 4,037
844% 3,718 MB/s
4K Read 70.9
4K Write 188
4K Mixed 100
336% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,302
DQ Write 904
DQ Mixed 1,121
832% 1,109 MB/s
Poor: 299%
This bench: 520%
Great: 592%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.4% Good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 26.3
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 24.1
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 97.6
41% 97.6 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 27" 1280 720 ACI27EC ROG PG279Q
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,046 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,018
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback