QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics148% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory21.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors, , 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 20:38
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User EST-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7551P 32-Core
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
46.6% Average
Memory 51.7
1-Core 62.2
2-Core 118
45% 77.2 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 434
39% 329 Pts
64-Core 701
43% 701 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,756
MSI(1462 5100) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2802
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
148% Outstanding
Lighting 104
Reflection 205
Parallax 421
85% 243 fps
MRender 406
Gravity 491
Splatting 263
304% 387 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 148%
Great: 407%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 268GB
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 293 328 298 307 301 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 24GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 45.1
MC Write 48.8
MC Mixed 40.4
128% 44.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 20.8
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 145
28% 145 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 110%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 47 60 21.7" 1280 720 PSCCDD0 ParsecVDA
Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback