Asrock D1800M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics14.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive49.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock D1800M  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 20:34
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J1800
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
34.4% Below average
Memory 62.8
1-Core 21.5
2-Core 39.2
30% 41.2 Pts
4-Core 38.9
8-Core 36.5
5% 37.7 Pts
64-Core 35.2
2% 35.2 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560-$180
Zotac(19DA 3209) 1GB
CLim: 860 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Lighting 16.7
Reflection 29.3
Parallax 17.3
14% 21.1 fps
MRender 24.8
Gravity 18.5
Splatting 16.9
16% 20.1 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: XD0R840H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 167 205 204 212 167 MB/s
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.3% Average
Read 232
Write 214
Mixed 204
SusWrite 183
47% 208 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 38.1
4K Mixed 23.2
78% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 95.4
DQ Mixed 103
77% 102 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 99%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 319GB
225GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 67 71 67 64 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 64.5
Write 62.6
Mixed 40
SusWrite 65.7
43% 58.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL7-7-7 DDR3-1333 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.9% Very poor
MC Read 4.3
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 6.2
14% 4.97 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 4.7
11% 3.9 GB/s
Latency 164
24% 164 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 2: 0P 0R 0G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
2% 11% 19 172 22 60 0" 1280 720 Default
Typical D1800M Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock D1800M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback