HP 250 G7 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive18.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (86%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 250 G7 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84A6
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210203
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 19:45
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 86%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 4417U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Memory 24.7
1-Core 30.9
2-Core 53.5
21% 36.4 Pts
4-Core 51
8-Core 52.9
7% 52 Pts
64-Core 62.4
4% 62.4 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 610
HP(103C 84A6) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9171
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
1.93% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 3.2
2% 2.77 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 0.1
2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.93%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W-128G-1006 128GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6104006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 75 99 94 58 93 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
18.7% Very poor
Read 118
Write 95
Mixed 62.8
SusWrite 87.9
20% 91 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 9.6
4K Mixed 5.8
19% 6.6 MB/s
DQ Read 77.1
DQ Write 40.2
DQ Mixed 47.7
38% 55 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 90%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
906GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 50 87 97 97 102 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 90.1
Write 76.5
Mixed 48.9
SusWrite 87.1
56% 75.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
135% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
17.3% Very poor
MC Read 6.4
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 5.7
18% 6.33 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 4.3
12% 4.17 GB/s
Latency 300
13% 300 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 45 27 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15DB
Typical 250 G7 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 2,863 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP 250 G7 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback