Asus Zephyrus G GU502DU_GA502DU

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	57.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

18 months ago, 18 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 days ago.

System	Asus Zephyrus G GU502DU_GA502DU (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK GU502DU
Memory	10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210310
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	May 12 '24 at 19:21
Run Duration	119 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H 42,271 User benchmarks, average bench 54% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	51.4% Above average	Memory 64.9 1-Core 78.9 2-Core 134 55% 92.7 Pts	4-Core 206 8-Core 295 31% 250 Pts	64-Core 368 23% 368 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile Max-Q) 12,899 User benchmarks, average bench 57% Asus(1043 18D1) ≥ 4GB Ram: 128MB, Driver: 24.3.1 Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	57.2% Above average	Lighting 69.7 Reflection 109 Parallax 66.5 57% 81.7 fps	MRender 88.8 Gravity 66 Splatting 62.5 58% 72.4 fps
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 64%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1002 512GB 12,375 User benchmarks, average bench 188% 203GB free (System drive) Firmware: 21106000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 646 401 299 313 314 305 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 750 Write 819 Mixed 708 SusWrite 380 149% 664 MB/s	4K Read 23.7 4K Write 67.3 4K Mixed 36.9 119% 42.6 MB/s	DQ Read 511 DQ Write 401 DQ Mixed 524 374% 479 MB/s
Poor: 111% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 237%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 16GB 379 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 3200, 3200 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	49.4% Average	MC Read 20.9 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 17.7 53% 18.5 GB/s	SC Read 8.2 SC Write 13.6 SC Mixed 10.9 31% 10.9 GB/s	Latency 120 33% 120 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	6	157	7	144	23.8"	1920 1017	GSM5BB1 LG ULTRAGEAR

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Zephyrus G GU502DU_GA502DU Builds (Compare 600 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

System: Asus Zephyrus G GU502DU_GA502DU

CPU
Ryzen 7 3750HAMDBench 54%, 42,271 samples	600x

GPU
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	344x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 57%, 12,899 samples	255x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	1x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	334x
RBUSNS8154P3512GJ3 512GBKingstonBench 117%, 2,163 samples	123x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1002 512GBWDCBench 188%, 12,375 samples	17x

RAM
8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 16GBMicronBench 74%, 5,735 samples	369x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 1x8GBMicronBench 40%, 38,499 samples	43x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 16GBMicronBench 71%, 379 samples	42x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16