Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics61% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII HERO  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20161216
Uptime5 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 19:18
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$64
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Memory 95.6
1-Core 118
2-Core 234
85% 149 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 450
60% 451 Pts
64-Core 452
28% 452 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
MSI(1462 3177) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 551.61
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
61% Good
Lighting 76.1
Reflection 85.6
Parallax 76.8
62% 79.5 fps
MRender 75.9
Gravity 75.6
Splatting 67.3
59% 72.9 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 61%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk Ultra II 250GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41110WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 369
Write 364
Mixed 227
71% 320 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 67.1
4K Mixed 40.9
139% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 186
157% 230 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 102%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
131GB free
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 424 259 52 49 204 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 503
Write 440
Mixed 414
SusWrite 206
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 42.8
4K Mixed 0.9
68% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 50.9
DQ Mixed 0.9
28% 70.8 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LED DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$192
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
MC Read 34.2
MC Write 39.5
MC Mixed 32.6
101% 35.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 41
SC Mixed 28.7
86% 30 GB/s
Latency 55.7
72% 55.7 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 144 27" 1280 720 SAM717B LS27AG30x
Typical MAXIMUS VIII HERO Builds (Compare 7,199 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $695
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback