MSI MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 172%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 166%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics210% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B93
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93)  (all builds)
Memory53.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210120
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 19:15
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Memory 76
1-Core 137
2-Core 264
86% 159 Pts
4-Core 494
8-Core 853
82% 674 Pts
64-Core 1,108
69% 1,108 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.61
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
210% Outstanding
Lighting 314
Reflection 284
Parallax 317
256% 305 fps
MRender 342
Gravity 250
Splatting 182
202% 258 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 210%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,067
Write 2,646
Mixed 1,296
448% 2,003 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 61
219% 83.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,310
DQ Write 1,118
DQ Mixed 1,191
899% 1,206 MB/s
Poor: 274% Great: 488%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
292GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 398 391 391 386 383 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 460
Write 414
Mixed 359
SusWrite 394
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 77.2
4K Mixed 47.9
158% 54.1 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 203
152% 203 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 101%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
111GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 153 154 153 153 153 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Read 452
Write 410
Mixed 353
SusWrite 186
78% 350 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 77.6
4K Mixed 46.1
153% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 200
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 115%
SK hynix SC300 2.5 7MM 256GB
36GB free
Firmware: 20100P00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 345 342 347 346 342 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Read 444
Write 348
Mixed 303
SusWrite 345
81% 360 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 61.7
4K Mixed 29.4
106% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 198
147% 194 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW64GX4M2E3200C16 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.6% Very good
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 29.4
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 25.6
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 88.7
45% 88.7 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 7: 0P 0R 2G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
7% 14% 21 192 15 165 27" 2560 1369 MSI3CA8 MSI G273Q
Typical MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93) Builds (Compare 4,573 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 161%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 162%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $980
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback