Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	139% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 3,267 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	65.6% Good	Memory 76.9 1-Core 81.6 2-Core 146 61% 102 Pts	4-Core 293 8-Core 495 48% 394 Pts	64-Core 733 45% 733 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 79%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ne-256 2280 256GB 216 User benchmarks, average bench 171% 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN6329 SusWrite @10s intervals: 595 773 339 48 30 24 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	139% Outstanding	Read 1,350 Write 768 Mixed 775 SusWrite 302 177% 799 MB/s	4K Read 36.6 4K Write 64.9 4K Mixed 45.5 148% 49 MB/s	DQ Read 604 DQ Write 312 DQ Mixed 480 351% 465 MB/s
Poor: 88% ↑ This bench: 139% Great: 250%
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40 22,667 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 149GB free Firmware: JF100-19 SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 77 76 78 77 77 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	42.4% Average	Read 71.2 Write 78.8 Mixed 50.2 SusWrite 76.4 51% 69.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Atermiter 2x8GB 2,316 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	53.8% Above average	MC Read 22.6 MC Write 18.4 MC Mixed 17.1 55% 19.4 GB/s	SC Read 11.5 SC Write 15 SC Mixed 14.3 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 80.8 50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 70%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
21%	17%	52	190	19	60	0"	1280 720

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16