Acer Nitro AN515-54

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics37.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-54  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Octavia_CFS
Memory1.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200916
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 18:45
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 67%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Memory 52
1-Core 66.6
2-Core 65
40% 61.2 Pts
4-Core 148
8-Core 223
23% 186 Pts
64-Core 191
12% 191 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1332) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3203
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37.1% Below average
Lighting 46.7
Reflection 65.7
Parallax 38
38% 50.1 fps
MRender 38.5
Gravity 41.3
Splatting 47.4
35% 42.4 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253X6512G 512GB
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 57 42 29 44 33 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.9% Very poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 6.1
18% 6.3 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 5.5
13% 4.5 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 135 24 60 15.5" 1280 720 LGD065A
Typical Nitro AN515-54 Builds (Compare 11,885 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-54

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback