Asus PRIME Z790M-PLUS D4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 116%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics196% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
24 days ago, 24 days ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z790M-PLUS D4  (all builds)
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 16:59
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700KF-$189
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Memory 86.2
1-Core 202
2-Core 403
120% 231 Pts
4-Core 783
8-Core 1,360
130% 1,071 Pts
64-Core 2401
149% 2401 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 116%
Great: 121%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7800-XT
Sapphire(1DA2 475D) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.4.1
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
196% Outstanding
Lighting 252
Reflection 270
Parallax 518
206% 347 fps
MRender 323
Gravity 303
Splatting 284
246% 303 fps
Poor: 130%
This bench: 196%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$60
770GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 32B3T8ED Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2358
Write 1,530
Mixed 778
341% 1,555 MB/s
4K Read 51.9
4K Write 204
4K Mixed 97.5
312% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,186
DQ Write 924
DQ Mixed 729
634% 946 MB/s
Poor: 175% Great: 372%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
14GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 22.6
Write 13.7
Mixed 16.4
21% 17.6 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.7
60% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3600C16D4/16GX 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
95.9% Outstanding
MC Read 35.3
MC Write 34.2
MC Mixed 32.9
98% 34.1 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 39.1
SC Mixed 29.5
89% 31.1 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 60 31.5" 1280 720 GBT3209 M32UC
Typical PRIME Z790M-PLUS D4 Builds (Compare 760 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 221%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 242%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z790M-PLUS D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $1,130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback