Intel X99H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics96.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemIntel X99
MotherboardIntel X99H  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230509
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 16:48
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 78.9
1-Core 82.2
2-Core 161
63% 107 Pts
4-Core 313
8-Core 551
52% 432 Pts
64-Core 1,006
62% 1,006 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
MSI(1462 C754) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96.9% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 156
Parallax 105
94% 126 fps
MRender 175
Gravity 110
Splatting 101
102% 129 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
120gb SSD 120GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3.24
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 432
Write 376
Mixed 283
81% 364 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 65.1
4K Mixed 11.4
87% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 87.4
DQ Write 213
DQ Mixed 21.1
53% 107 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 80%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
294GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 134 133 135 132 134 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 172
Mixed 116
SusWrite 134
113% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1
210% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GR7MFR4N-TF 2x8GB
2 of 24 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
60.7% Good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 19.3
64% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 15.6
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 80.6
50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 165 27" 1280 720 HPN3722 HP X27
Typical X99H Builds (Compare 1,179 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Intel X99H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback