Dell Precision 5820 Tower X-Series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics66.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Precision 5820 Tower X-Series  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0X75JG
Memory56.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240310
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 16:06
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900X
CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Memory 77
1-Core 136
2-Core 269
87% 161 Pts
4-Core 529
8-Core 976
90% 752 Pts
64-Core 1,664
103% 1,664 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P4000
Dell(1028 11A3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1708 MHz, MLim: 1901 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.61
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
66.9% Good
Lighting 79.3
Reflection 88.3
Parallax 82
65% 83.2 fps
MRender 84.5
Gravity 83.7
Splatting 91.3
71% 86.5 fps
Poor: 64%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
298GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 532
Write 506
Mixed 520
116% 519 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 53
180% 64.8 MB/s
DQ Read 755
DQ Write 622
DQ Mixed 926
629% 768 MB/s
Poor: 144% Great: 295%
Nvme Lexar SSD NM710 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 9742 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,041
Write 1781
Mixed 1701
410% 1,841 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 56.4
214% 81.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,132
DQ Write 869
DQ Mixed 946
722% 982 MB/s
Poor: 210% Great: 385%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$97
2TB free
Firmware: MX6OAEA0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 173
Write 154
Mixed 29
86% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
140% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 108%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 64GB
12GB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 88.8
Write 66.9
Mixed 67.6
92% 74.4 MB/s
4K Read 8.6
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 5.4
348% 5.97 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GU6JJR8N-VK 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 35.1
MC Write 53.9
MC Mixed 33.1
116% 40.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 9.9
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 101%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 48 17 60 27" 2560 1377 BNQ8024 BenQ LCD
Typical Precision 5820 Tower X-Series Builds (Compare 943 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

System: Dell Precision 5820 Tower X-Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback