Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics20.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte H110M-S2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170609
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 15:31
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User BGD-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100-$38
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 89
1-Core 114
2-Core 202
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 312
42% 311 Pts
64-Core 300
19% 300 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
Sapphire(1DA2 E348) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1216 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.Q4
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
20.9% Poor
Lighting 24.6
Reflection 28.2
Parallax 35.6
20% 29.5 fps
MRender 27.6
Gravity 29.6
Splatting 25.9
22% 27.7 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 128GB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1A30Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 305 47 23 14 14 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 442
Write 369
Mixed 343
SusWrite 126
72% 320 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 87.9
4K Mixed 8.2
100% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 13.3
65% 142 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 93%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
443GB free
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 108 109 109 109 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
61% Good
Read 104
Write 110
Mixed 55.3
SusWrite 109
69% 94.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 61%
Great: 74%
WD Green 500GB (2012)
265GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 121 120 121 120 121 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 138
Write 111
Mixed 101
SusWrite 120
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.7
163% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown X-STAR 4GB 2400MHz 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.4% Very good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 23.8
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 23.5
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 23 3 60 18.5" 1280 720 GSM4C18 19EN33
Typical GA-H110M-S2-CF Builds (Compare 1,948 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $182
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback