Asus M5A97 LE R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics78.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive86.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 LE R2.0  (all builds)
Memory19.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160324
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 13:53
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8300-$168
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Memory 73.4
1-Core 61.2
2-Core 111
51% 82 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 360
34% 280 Pts
64-Core 361
22% 361 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Gigabyte(1458 3735) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.4% Very good
Lighting 96.1
Reflection 108
Parallax 98.6
78% 101 fps
MRender 93.4
Gravity 97.5
Splatting 96.4
78% 95.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 276 285 302 287 290 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Read 484
Write 444
Mixed 312
SusWrite 281
85% 380 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 68.9
4K Mixed 34.3
126% 44.4 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 8.8
74% 172 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 128%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
920GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 145 147 145 147 147 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Read 151
Write 140
Mixed 118
SusWrite 142
102% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KRE-D3U1600M/8G R534G1601U1S KRE-D3U1600M/8G R534G1601U1S 24GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.1% Below average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 11.6
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 9.6
25% 8.77 GB/s
Latency 92.8
43% 92.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 52 60 23.8" 1280 720 AUS24C1 VA249
Typical M5A97 LE R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,462 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $377
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback