Asus PRIME X570-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 294%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 346%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 111%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics279% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive231% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X570-PRO  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 13:42
Run Duration305 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$369
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Memory 91.8
1-Core 177
2-Core 355
111% 208 Pts
4-Core 695
8-Core 1,345
121% 1,020 Pts
64-Core 2,719
168% 2,719 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 111%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$970
CLim: 3210 MHz, MLim: 6350 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 551.46
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
279% Outstanding
Lighting 410
Reflection 415
Parallax 434
334% 420 fps
MRender 520
Gravity 370
Splatting 264
301% 384 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 279%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte Aorus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$117
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM13.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 23 23 1262 645 3.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
231% Outstanding
Read 2,154
Write 3,591
Mixed 2,247
SusWrite 337
470% 2,082 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 187
4K Mixed 75.4
264% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,535
DQ Write 389
DQ Mixed 10
254% 645 MB/s
Poor: 194%
This bench: 231%
Great: 496%
Samsung 870 QVO 8TB-$578
866GB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 258 162 164 166 164 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 394
Mixed 430
SusWrite 227
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 92.1
4K Mixed 53
173% 60.8 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 200
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 97%
Great: 129%
Gigabyte Aorus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$117
724GB free
Firmware: EGFM13.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1542 682 573 671 626 742 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
281% Outstanding
Read 1,962
Write 2,044
Mixed 2,290
SusWrite 806
400% 1,775 MB/s
4K Read 48
4K Write 218
4K Mixed 85.9
298% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 1548
DQ Write 1186
DQ Mixed 1,362
1,020% 1,365 MB/s
Poor: 194%
This bench: 281%
Great: 496%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$93
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 127 125 126 126 125 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 140
Write 128
Mixed 80.6
SusWrite 126
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.9
181% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 88%
WD Elements 2620 2TB
1TB free, PID 2620
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
22.3% Poor
Read 34.8
Write 36
Mixed 26.6
SusWrite 37.2
46% 33.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.8
129% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C14 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
60.6% Good
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 19.1
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 21
61% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 21 0 120 27" 1280 720 ACR070D Acer XB273K S
Typical PRIME X570-PRO Builds (Compare 5,402 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X570-PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $1,242
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback