Asus P8H61-M LX3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics53.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LX3  (all builds)
Memory2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 12:55
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU 33%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G460
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Memory 60
1-Core 42.6
2-Core 53.1
36% 51.9 Pts
4-Core 52.7
8-Core 53.7
7% 53.2 Pts
64-Core 46
3% 46 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
XFX(1682 9588) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Lighting 67.3
Reflection 62.7
Parallax 94.4
55% 74.8 fps
MRender 65.3
Gravity 80.3
Splatting 48.8
52% 64.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8FM04.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 175 77 32 43 89 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.2% Below average
Read 241
Write 205
Mixed 160
SusWrite 93.5
39% 175 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 29.9
4K Mixed 15.3
58% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 65.4
62% 98.1 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
MC Read 6.4
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 6.3
19% 6.53 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 7
19% 6.77 GB/s
Latency 154
26% 154 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 53 60 84.6" 1280 720 SAM712A SAMSUNG
Typical P8H61-M LX3 Builds (Compare 359 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LX3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $103
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback