PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 53.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 38.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P8H61-M LX3 (all builds) |
Memory | 2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120111 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | May 12 '24 at 12:55 |
Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
Run User | SRB-User |
Background CPU | 33% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel Celeron G460
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
|
34.3%
Below average
|
36% 51.9 Pts
|
7% 53.2 Pts
|
3% 46 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
53.7%
Above average
|
55% 74.8 fps
|
52% 64.8 fps
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
|
19.9%
Very poor
|
19% 6.53 GB/s
|
19% 6.77 GB/s
|
26% 154 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 66 | 53 | 60 | 84.6" | 1280 720 | SAM712A SAMSUNG |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i3-2120Intel $75Bench 51%, 77,810 samples | 35x |
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 33x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 27x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 43x |
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 26x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 18x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 59% - Above average | Total price: $103 |