MSI Z270 GAMING M7 (MS-7A57)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive91.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7A57
MotherboardMSI Z270 GAMING M7 (MS-7A57)  (all builds)
Memory7.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180630
Uptime7.8 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 11:28
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$235
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Memory 95.7
1-Core 139
2-Core 265
93% 166 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 706
74% 593 Pts
64-Core 756
47% 756 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
MSI(1462 3609) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 173
Reflection 189
Parallax 181
141% 181 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 175
Splatting 125
117% 145 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 126%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 205 163 166 166 161 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 468
Mixed 384
SusWrite 212
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 56.4
4K Mixed 42.2
143% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 329
246% 330 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
94GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 406 354 293 257 233 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 433
Mixed 355
SusWrite 326
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 53.6
4K Mixed 45.3
142% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 295
DQ Mixed 349
258% 343 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 134%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 404 406 405 396 405 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
32.8% Below average
Read 122
Write 214
Mixed 11.2
SusWrite 403
43% 188 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 10.6
4K Mixed 1.8
10% 4.63 MB/s
DQ Read 6.6
DQ Write 9.9
DQ Mixed 6.5
5% 7.67 MB/s
Poor: 113%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 541%
WD Black SN850X NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$89
641GB free
Firmware: 620331WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2172 2080 2181 2035 1163 915 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
287% Outstanding
Read 2,401
Write 2,155
Mixed 2,088
SusWrite 1,758
472% 2,100 MB/s
4K Read 57.3
4K Write 71.9
4K Mixed 54.5
195% 61.2 MB/s
DQ Read 828
DQ Write 255
DQ Mixed 482
371% 522 MB/s
Poor: 251%
This bench: 287%
Great: 598%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LED DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$192
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
82% Excellent
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 23.7
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 26.4
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 54.9
73% 54.9 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 82%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 47 14 60 32" 2560 1377 ACR049D XB321HK
Typical Z270 GAMING M7 (MS-7A57) Builds (Compare 1,475 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI Z270 GAMING M7 (MS-7A57) - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,109
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback