Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 3  (all builds)
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190322
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 11:16
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Memory 90.4
1-Core 130
2-Core 261
89% 161 Pts
4-Core 494
8-Core 790
79% 642 Pts
64-Core 1,042
64% 1,042 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 140
Parallax 143
105% 137 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 136
Splatting 118
100% 122 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 102%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg30zms128g NVMe TOSHIBA 128GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ADDA0103 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 780
Write 345
Mixed 151
92% 425 MB/s
4K Read 42.7
4K Write 62.8
4K Mixed 51.8
164% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 273
DQ Mixed 292
226% 312 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 123%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
63GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 116 112 112 110 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 98.3
Write 99.5
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 112
70% 95.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 112%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
182GB free, PID 3312
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 105 103 106 93 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 128
Write 95.6
Mixed 73.4
SusWrite 101
130% 99.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
64% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C12 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.3% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 11.1
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 13.2
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 100 34" 1280 720 MSI1462 MSI MAG341CQ
Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 3 Builds (Compare 1,641 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 115% - Outstanding Total price: $532
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback