MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 189%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 176%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics188% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive151% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory21.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231013
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 10:16
Run Duration331 Seconds
Run User IRQ-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$305
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 97.5
1-Core 144
2-Core 306
100% 183 Pts
4-Core 570
8-Core 882
90% 726 Pts
64-Core 1,295
80% 1,295 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 102%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6950-XT
XFX(1EAE 6950) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.4.1
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
188% Outstanding
Lighting 237
Reflection 230
Parallax 535
193% 334 fps
MRender 381
Gravity 195
Splatting 312
242% 296 fps
Poor: 183%
This bench: 188%
Great: 214%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
316GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 370 365 371 371 371 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Read 368
Write 370
Mixed 318
SusWrite 369
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 69.7
4K Mixed 47
155% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 253
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 224
169% 227 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 134%
Corsair MP600 CORE XT 4TB
2.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFMC1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 176 171 258 210 208 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
151% Outstanding
Read 1736
Write 657
Mixed 88
SusWrite 205
145% 672 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 47.3
4K Mixed 5.3
97% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1303
DQ Write 609
DQ Mixed 1,175
814% 1,029 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 151%
Great: 546%
Spcc M.2 PCIE SSD 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: VF001C27 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3591 3658 3719 3641 3711 2227 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
415% Outstanding
Read 2,144
Write 3,816
Mixed 2,057
SusWrite 3,425
650% 2,861 MB/s
4K Read 51.3
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 66.6
218% 74.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,311
DQ Write 1065
DQ Mixed 1,096
846% 1,157 MB/s
Poor: 148%
This bench: 415%
Great: 500%
Lexar 512GB SSD 512GB
322GB free
Firmware: V1.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1917 1905 1002 401 440 209 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
225% Outstanding
Read 1338
Write 1,946
Mixed 1,407
SusWrite 979
321% 1,418 MB/s
4K Read 53.4
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 67
227% 78.2 MB/s
DQ Read 753
DQ Write 1,082
DQ Mixed 768
622% 867 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 225%
Great: 313%
Dahua C800 2.5 inch SATA 1TB SSD
785GB free
Firmware: SN14546
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 420 417 414 421 420 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Read 451
Write 444
Mixed 419
SusWrite 423
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 62.2
4K Mixed 37
127% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 194
147% 199 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 104%
Dahua C800 2.5 inch SATA 1TB SSD
872GB free
Firmware: SN14546
SusWrite @10s intervals: 447 420 416 414 421 420 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Read 439
Write 448
Mixed 422
SusWrite 423
98% 433 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 61.2
4K Mixed 37.4
127% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 202
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMG16GX4M2E3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 49.9
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 39.6
108% 37.8 GB/s
SC Read 30.6
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 39.1
89% 31.2 GB/s
Latency 56.8
70% 56.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 105%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 165 27.2" 1280 720 GSM5C4D LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,554 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,002
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback