Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 102% UFO	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 125% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	53.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS PRO (all builds)
Memory	53 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200616
Uptime	30.8 Days
Run Date	May 12 '24 at 10:14
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	76% Very good	Memory 65.9 1-Core 128 2-Core 255 80% 150 Pts	4-Core 459 8-Core 996 85% 728 Pts	64-Core 2055 127% 2055 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340 442,467 User benchmarks, average bench 128% MSI(1462 3973) CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.13 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	134% Outstanding	Lighting 191 Reflection 176 Parallax 167 156% 178 fps	MRender 189 Gravity 137 Splatting 118 118% 148 fps
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 134% Great: 136%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 322GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 79 80 81 82 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	53.4% Above average	Read 296 Write 82.9 Mixed 65.6 SusWrite 79.1 28% 131 MB/s	4K Read 19.4 4K Write 80.4 4K Mixed 23.8 102% 41.2 MB/s	DQ Read 174 DQ Write 83.3 DQ Mixed 106 84% 121 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 121%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 299GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 35 35 36 36 37 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	16.3% Very poor	Read 34.5 Write 35.9 Mixed 27.7 SusWrite 36.1 46% 33.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 59% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK64GX4M2D3600C18 2x31.5GB 8,435 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 2 of 4 slots used 63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	72.2% Very good	MC Read 28.4 MC Write 25.1 MC Mixed 25.4 75% 26.3 GB/s	SC Read 20.8 SC Write 17.9 SC Mixed 26 62% 21.6 GB/s	Latency 112 36% 112 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 132%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 36: 0P 5R 3G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
36%	24%	42	217	59	60	27.5"	1280 720	SAM0D70 U28E570

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X570 AORUS PRO Builds (Compare 1,970 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 182%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 181%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS PRO

CPU
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $180Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	358x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $260Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	329x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $190Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	284x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $879Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	155x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	129x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	113x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	164x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	143x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $145Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	95x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	76x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $103Bench 88%, 110,884 samples	57x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBKingstonBench 90%, 54,651 samples	45x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $1,152

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16