Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics80.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive241% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte X299 AORUS Gaming 3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory22.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170914
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 09:55
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User CYP-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7800X-$206
CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 68.9
1-Core 122
2-Core 236
77% 142 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 765
72% 600 Pts
64-Core 988
61% 988 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 75%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
EVGA(3842 6573) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.7% Excellent
Lighting 99.4
Reflection 113
Parallax 102
81% 105 fps
MRender 95.1
Gravity 97.8
Splatting 99.4
80% 97.4 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$120
412GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P4CR311 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1772 1835 1854 1693 1590 925 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
241% Outstanding
Read 1,544
Write 1,724
Mixed 1,096
SusWrite 1,611
337% 1,494 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 80.2
4K Mixed 41.4
149% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 930
DQ Write 631
DQ Mixed 704
546% 755 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 241%
Great: 370%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
1TB free
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1130 426 286 285 284 286 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
166% Outstanding
Read 1,457
Write 1105
Mixed 496
SusWrite 449
194% 877 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 82.6
4K Mixed 38.2
144% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 880
DQ Write 750
DQ Mixed 514
468% 715 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 166%
Great: 236%
ST1000LM 048-2E7172 1TB
15GB free, PID 0237
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 49 55 62 64 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
28.9% Poor
Read 55.4
Write 74.8
Mixed 90.5
SusWrite 57.8
99% 69.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
121% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
73.6% Very good
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 43.8
MC Mixed 21.7
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 10
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 48 14 144 31.5" 2560 1377 SAM0E14 C32HG7x
Typical GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 362 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $830
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback