Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	34.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	88.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX505DT
Memory	2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210128
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 12 '24 at 09:52
Run Duration	122 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	45%

PC Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H 57,853 User benchmarks, average bench 53% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	22.3% Poor	Memory 4.93 1-Core 64.9 2-Core 119 30% 62.8 Pts	4-Core 213 8-Core 298 32% 255 Pts	64-Core 274 17% 274 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile) 92,838 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Asus(1043 109F) ≥ 4GB Ram: 128MB, Driver: 21.20.25.02 Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	34.5% Below average	Lighting 40 Reflection 81 Parallax 49.7 33% 56.9 fps	MRender 41 Gravity 49.6 Splatting 48.4 38% 46.3 fps
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 46%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GB 29,713 User benchmarks, average bench 149% 226GB free (System drive) Firmware: P1MA0V4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 418 514 496 519 518 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	88.8% Excellent	Read 436 Write 573 Mixed 578 SusWrite 479 117% 516 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 31.7 4K Mixed 25.9 81% 26 MB/s	DQ Read 368 DQ Write 385 DQ Mixed 407 298% 387 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 88.8% Great: 181%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GB 28,935 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	17.7% Very poor	MC Read 6.4 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 5.3 17% 6 GB/s	SC Read 6.3 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 5.6 16% 5.57 GB/s	Latency 193 21% 193 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 17.7% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	4	114	3	60	15.5"	1536 793	NCP002D

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT Builds (Compare 2,836 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

CPU
Ryzen 5 3550HAMDBench 53%, 57,853 samples	1,850x
Ryzen 7 3750HAMDBench 54%, 42,271 samples	986x

GPU
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	1,371x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	953x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	511x

SSD
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	1,163x
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	409x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	381x

RAM
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 48,644 samples	594x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples	377x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 76%, 29,128 samples	137x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16