Asus ROG MAXIMUS XII HERO (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 170%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics171% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive258% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS XII HERO (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory20 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220517
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 08:38
Run Duration371 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900K-$415
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 93.3
1-Core 150
2-Core 300
99% 181 Pts
4-Core 575
8-Core 1,029
96% 802 Pts
64-Core 1,940
120% 1,940 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 100%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
EVGA(3842 3888) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
171% Outstanding
Lighting 244
Reflection 220
Parallax 281
198% 248 fps
MRender 278
Gravity 208
Splatting 152
168% 213 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 171%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 563 513 571 577 572 566 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
258% Outstanding
Read 2,522
Write 2,236
Mixed 1,685
SusWrite 560
390% 1,751 MB/s
4K Read 59.2
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 78.5
261% 90.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,112
DQ Write 749
DQ Mixed 932
695% 931 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 258%
Great: 355%
Samsung 870 EVO 4TB-$368
3.5TB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 471 477 470 473 478 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 484
Mixed 453
SusWrite 470
108% 480 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 98.7
4K Mixed 57.3
189% 65.8 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 356
268% 357 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 124%
Great: 137%
WD Blue 3D 1TB-$70
623GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 470 475 469 472 478 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 478
Mixed 335
SusWrite 469
100% 447 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 93.4
4K Mixed 47.3
161% 58 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 249
213% 314 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 114%
Great: 121%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
201GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1482 387 387 388 387 387 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
252% Outstanding
Read 2379
Write 2099
Mixed 1,533
SusWrite 570
367% 1,645 MB/s
4K Read 59.9
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 78
259% 88.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,007
DQ Write 855
DQ Mixed 1,033
746% 965 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 252%
Great: 302%
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 250GB
572GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1772 1604 1600 1602 1587 1558 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
322% Outstanding
Read 2,548
Write 2,329
Mixed 1,848
SusWrite 1,620
468% 2,086 MB/s
4K Read 54.3
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 71.4
248% 88.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,189
DQ Write 822
DQ Mixed 1,015
755% 1,009 MB/s
Poor: 185%
This bench: 322%
Great: 405%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3600 C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
MC Read 35.5
MC Write 39
MC Mixed 28.8
98% 34.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 45.6
SC Mixed 29.2
89% 31 GB/s
Latency 60.5
66% 60.5 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 240 27" 1280 720 SAM105C LC27G7xT
Typical ROG MAXIMUS XII HERO (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 3,999 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 183%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 196%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS XII HERO (WI-FI) - $480

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $1,818
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback