Asus ROG MAXIMUS XI EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive317% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS XI EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory20.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211102
Uptime11.1 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 07:57
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$191
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Memory 87.4
1-Core 133
2-Core 261
89% 160 Pts
4-Core 477
8-Core 782
77% 629 Pts
64-Core 1,014
63% 1,014 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Lighting 180
Reflection 198
Parallax 207
147% 195 fps
MRender 141
Gravity 184
Splatting 129
122% 151 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 131%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$160
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2041 2042 1907 1803 1764 1796 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
317% Outstanding
Read 2,268
Write 2,096
Mixed 2,033
SusWrite 1,892
467% 2,072 MB/s
4K Read 53.1
4K Write 89.9
4K Mixed 65.5
212% 69.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,159
DQ Write 871
DQ Mixed 987
745% 1,005 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 317%
Great: 526%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$160
2TB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2054 2141 2144 2118 2103 2079 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
329% Outstanding
Read 2,244
Write 2,110
Mixed 1,963
SusWrite 2,106
474% 2,106 MB/s
4K Read 52.5
4K Write 88.1
4K Mixed 67
212% 69.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,068
DQ Write 907
DQ Mixed 1,003
747% 993 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 329%
Great: 526%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174
2.5TB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 21,853
Mixed 97.3
7,845% 10,975 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.5
187% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 113%
WD WD1500HLFS-01G6U1 150GB
51GB free
Firmware: 04.04V01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 94 94 95 96 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 96.7
Write 78.1
Mixed 64.7
SusWrite 95
62% 83.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
217% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 68%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
33GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 22,886
Mixed 68.3
8,202% 11,477 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 4000 C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.1% Very good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 22.6
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 28.9
SC Mixed 22.1
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 14% 7 217 58 60 84.6" 1280 720 SAM7140 Q70A
History: Score 1: 0P 0R 0G 1B | Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B
Typical ROG MAXIMUS XI EXTREME Builds (Compare 570 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS XI EXTREME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $1,075
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback