Gigabyte GA-A520M DS3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics71.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive213% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A520M DS3H  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221109
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 03:13
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Memory 79.9
1-Core 164
2-Core 299
98% 181 Pts
4-Core 533
8-Core 823
84% 678 Pts
64-Core 1,008
62% 1,008 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.4% Very good
Lighting 86
Reflection 154
Parallax 93.1
70% 111 fps
MRender 89.4
Gravity 90.8
Splatting 90.1
74% 90.1 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
311GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 709 247 293 227 184 203 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
213% Outstanding
Read 1,593
Write 1,844
Mixed 1,580
SusWrite 310
299% 1,332 MB/s
4K Read 51.4
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 74.2
253% 92.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,343
DQ Write 972
DQ Mixed 1,087
831% 1134 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 213%
Great: 295%
Patriot Burst 240GB
199GB free
Firmware: SBFMK1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 403 403 392 401 412 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 285
Write 203
Mixed 204
SusWrite 403
62% 274 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 43.5
4K Mixed 21.6
89% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 44.2
DQ Write 49.8
DQ Mixed 41.8
33% 45.3 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 94%
HyperX Savage 240GB-$117
223GB free
Firmware: SAFM00.U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 475 484 473 472 476 480 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 480
Mixed 332
SusWrite 477
101% 447 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 97.3
4K Mixed 38.5
146% 55.2 MB/s
DQ Read 332
DQ Write 374
DQ Mixed 69.4
131% 258 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 110%
Great: 111%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$26
346GB free
Firmware: 0005HPM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 66 65 66 66 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 75.3
Write 53.8
Mixed 39.2
SusWrite 65.6
43% 58.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
104% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
MC Read 39.1
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 35.9
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 24.6
SC Mixed 32.4
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 80.9
49% 80.9 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 240 23.8" 1280 720 VSC3B3B XG2431
Typical GA-A520M DS3H Builds (Compare 1,005 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A520M DS3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $143
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback