HP Elite x2 1012 G2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.34% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Elite x2 1012 G2  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82CA
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2736 x 1824 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231005
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 02:19
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User CRI-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7600U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
42.9% Average
Memory 64.7
1-Core 34.6
2-Core 96.1
40% 65.1 Pts
4-Core 124
8-Core 129
17% 126 Pts
64-Core 189
12% 189 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 82CA) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
5.34% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 5.4
5% 5.63 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 7.5
5% 6.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.34%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$33
421GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AAHA4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,042
Write 942
Mixed 821
208% 935 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 74.6
4K Mixed 48.1
155% 52.7 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 285
210% 280 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 216%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 123GB
112GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 35.8
Write 20.7
Mixed 25.1
32% 27.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 2.2
153% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 825633-991 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
52.9% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 17.7
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 16.5
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 12.3" 1280 720 LGD056F
Typical Elite x2 1012 G2 Builds (Compare 296 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP Elite x2 1012 G2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback