HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 16-a0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics42.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 16-a0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 87AF
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210317
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 00:58
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 122
2-Core 235
81% 146 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 578
62% 495 Pts
64-Core 572
35% 572 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile Max-Q)
HP(103C 87AF) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.4626
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.1% Average
Lighting 40
Reflection 114
Parallax 69.5
33% 74.5 fps
MRender 92.8
Gravity 68.6
Splatting 65.5
61% 75.6 fps
Poor: 40%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 64%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Optane+477G 512GB
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 17.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 538 190 139 109 57 58 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 35% Great: 94%
Seagate Portable 2TB
951GB free
Firmware: 0712
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 99 97 99 100 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 64.5
Write 106
Mixed 84.2
SusWrite 98.9
66% 88.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.9
126% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.C4FE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.1% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 16.5
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 16
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 76.1
53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 44 8 144 16" 1536 793 CMN1602
Typical Pavilion Gaming Laptop 16-a0xxx Builds (Compare 2,312 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 16-a0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback