Acer Nitro AN515-57

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-57  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL Scala_TLS
Memory12 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220602
Uptime6.8 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 00:47
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Memory 68.3
1-Core 151
2-Core 295
90% 171 Pts
4-Core 499
8-Core 784
79% 642 Pts
64-Core 1,034
64% 1,034 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 1539) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.3302
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
7.2% Terrible
Lighting 7.9
Reflection 15.9
Parallax 11.9
6% 11.9 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 11.6
Splatting 9.8
9% 10.7 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.2%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WD_BLACK SN770 1TB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731030WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4024
Write 3,588
Mixed 2,664
761% 3,425 MB/s
4K Read 71.3
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 86.5
312% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1007
DQ Write 667
DQ Mixed 845
628% 840 MB/s
Poor: 191% Great: 636%
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70
1GB free
Firmware: 507KC4
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 216
Write 159
Mixed 186
42% 187 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 61
4K Mixed 36.3
121% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 288
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 181
150% 219 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 94%
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HBLU-00BTW 512GB
457GB free
Firmware: FXM7201Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1638 1646 1101 372 309 364 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
216% Outstanding
Read 1,634
Write 1,584
Mixed 1,451
SusWrite 905
313% 1,394 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 99.2
4K Mixed 55.3
186% 65.3 MB/s
DQ Read 956
DQ Write 728
DQ Mixed 829
623% 838 MB/s
Poor: 104%
This bench: 216%
Great: 242%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.C16FN 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
88.7% Excellent
MC Read 34.9
MC Write 33.6
MC Mixed 31
95% 33.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 35.6
SC Mixed 17.9
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 15: 0P 3R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
15% 75% 4 217 58 144 15.5" 1280 720 NCP004D
Typical Nitro AN515-57 Builds (Compare 15,227 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-57

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback