MSI MS-17L2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.89% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive227% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star Katana GF76 11UD
MotherboardMSI MS-17L2  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210722
Uptime2 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 00:21
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Memory 75.7
1-Core 156
2-Core 306
95% 179 Pts
4-Core 543
8-Core 741
81% 642 Pts
64-Core 900
56% 900 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 12EB) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.2079
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
6.89% Terrible
Lighting 9.7
Reflection 16.2
Parallax 11.7
8% 12.5 fps
MRender 1.2
Gravity 1
Splatting 12.8
5% 5 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.89%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1032 512GB
338GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21111000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 731 397 294 292 297 319 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
227% Outstanding
Read 1,570
Write 1,612
Mixed 1,276
SusWrite 388
271% 1,211 MB/s
4K Read 55.8
4K Write 218
4K Mixed 83.1
306% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 1,248
DQ Write 827
DQ Mixed 964
739% 1,013 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 227%
Great: 232%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2R1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
MC Read 37.8
MC Write 34.5
MC Mixed 29
96% 33.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 40.1
SC Mixed 19
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 93
43% 93 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 144 17.3" 1280 720 AUO978F
Typical MS-17L2 Builds (Compare 2,433 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI MS-17L2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback