Acer Nitro AN517-51

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive180% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Nitro AN517-51  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Superb_CFS
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '24 at 21:39
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User LUX-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
64.6% Good
Memory 64
1-Core 117
2-Core 214
72% 132 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 487
53% 421 Pts
64-Core 510
32% 510 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1333) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6911
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
4.54% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 4.8
Parallax 6.1
4% 5.3 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 9.2
6% 6.27 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.54%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_2200_MTFD 512GB
325GB free (System drive)
Firmware: A003 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1047 1126 1172 941 1152 540 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
180% Outstanding
Read 1,212
Write 1,228
Mixed 1,035
SusWrite 996
252% 1,118 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 63.7
4K Mixed 42.4
135% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 720
DQ Write 565
DQ Mixed 628
474% 638 MB/s
Poor: 141%
This bench: 180%
Great: 244%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.3% Poor
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 7.5
27% 9.47 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 7.9
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 63 50 120 17.3" 1280 720 AUO479D
Typical Nitro AN517-51 Builds (Compare 2,505 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN517-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback