Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409DA_P1410CDA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409DA_P1410CDA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X409DA
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190828
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '24 at 21:07
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
41.7% Average
Memory 41.9
1-Core 89.7
2-Core 155
52% 95.7 Pts
4-Core 233
8-Core 275
33% 254 Pts
64-Core 282
17% 282 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 1B21) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.44.05
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.82% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 6.3
Parallax 6.9
4% 5.83 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 6
4% 5.33 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 3.82%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-000L2 256GB
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3L1QEXH7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,075
Write 1953
Mixed 1,418
404% 1,815 MB/s
4K Read 52.6
4K Write 87.7
4K Mixed 63.4
207% 67.9 MB/s
DQ Read 603
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 484
357% 477 MB/s
Poor: 119% Great: 264%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
37% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 13.7
38% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 7
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 188
21% 188 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 37%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 13.9" 1536 793 CMN14E5
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409DA_P1410CDA Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409DA_P1410CDA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback