Gigabyte Z790 AORUS ELITE AX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics373% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive452% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
26 days ago, 2 days ago.
MotherboardGigabyte Z790 AORUS ELITE AX  (all builds)
Memory55.9 GB free of 64 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231019
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 11 '24 at 21:03
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-14900KF-$505
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Memory 81.9
82% 81.9 Pts
Poor: 125% Great: 136%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,760
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
373% Outstanding
Lighting 601
Reflection 550
Parallax 679
490% 610 fps
MRender 502
Gravity 542
Splatting 281
345% 441 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 373%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SKC3000S1024G 1TB
767GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFK31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3261 1644 1413 1455 1171 1365 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
452% Outstanding
Read 2,847
Write 4,292
Mixed 2,902
SusWrite 1,718
664% 2,940 MB/s
4K Read 82.7
4K Write 320
4K Mixed 134
466% 179 MB/s
DQ Read 2,269
DQ Write 1,732
DQ Mixed 2,014
1,502% 2,005 MB/s
Poor: 239%
This bench: 452%
Great: 591%
Transcend TS4TMTE250H 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: A227VCJB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4074 2541 1274 1275 1276 1275 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
455% Outstanding
Read 3,532
Write 4,344
Mixed 2,598
SusWrite 1,952
699% 3,107 MB/s
4K Read 45.4
4K Write 291
4K Mixed 87.2
334% 141 MB/s
DQ Read 2,327
DQ Write 1,845
DQ Mixed 2,076
1,556% 2,083 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 455%
Great: 606%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF560C40-32 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
197% Outstanding
MC Read 80.7
MC Write 77.8
MC Mixed 75.4
223% 78 GB/s
SC Read 23
SC Write 52.1
SC Mixed 34.4
104% 36.5 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 142%
This bench: 197%
Great: 233%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 60: 0P 5R 10G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
40% 28% 36 216 57 165 31.5" 1280 720 AOC3202 Q32G2WG3
History: Score 40: 0P 5R 5G 0B | Score 60: 0P 5R 10G 5B
Typical GA-Z790 AORUS ELITE AX Builds (Compare 9,330 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 291%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 346%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z790 AORUS ELITE AX - $230

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $1,485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback