Huawei MACHC-WAX9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics8.63% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive255% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHuawei MACHC-WAX9  (all builds)
MotherboardHUAWEI MACHC-WAX9-PCB
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230309
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 11 '24 at 20:38
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10510U
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
49% Average
Memory 70.1
1-Core 72.5
2-Core 102
51% 81.6 Pts
4-Core 158
8-Core 187
22% 173 Pts
64-Core 180
11% 180 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 49%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX250
Device(1E83 3E21) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2686
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
8.63% Terrible
Lighting 10
Reflection 14.5
Parallax 10.2
8% 11.6 fps
MRender 14.6
Gravity 10.8
Splatting 10.4
10% 11.9 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 8.63%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-00000 1TB
653GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXF7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1381 1270 1274 1265 1409 1432 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
255% Outstanding
Read 2,220
Write 1,929
Mixed 1504
SusWrite 1,339
392% 1,748 MB/s
4K Read 53.5
4K Write 79.9
4K Mixed 69
212% 67.5 MB/s
DQ Read 483
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 366
279% 382 MB/s
Poor: 185%
This bench: 255%
Great: 355%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4EBE304ED-EGCG 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
56.7% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 18.1
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 17.1
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 7: 0P 1R 0G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
7% 43% 7 116 31 60 23.8" 1920 1009 AUS2421 ASUS VG249
Typical MACHC-WAX9 Builds (Compare 565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Huawei MACHC-WAX9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback